Conceptualization On The “Essence” Of Being.
⥸
The approach to the theory of mind and consciousness started with the question, “who am I?” Of course the answer as to whether a human possesses free will is still in question, the simple answer is that the knowledge of such a complex idea is left unknown. One only is in the state of ignorance when trying to consider this idea. As one is a babe--in which has not the slightest knowledge of anything, not even the knowing in what one is to do in life. A babe is in the state of ignorance, that in which has little consciousness of, or awareness in the sense of being. One who is the babe after having been conceived on this planet knows nothing of the nature of self. But when a babe grows and learns of things due to external influences and experiences the babe has become one with its surrounding order of nature. For the thought of being alive is quite apparent, and the idea of living is evident. But the substance in which is called soul is not. When someone is thinking of the event that is to happen in the future, they haven’t a clue as to whether the future will actually materialize. When a babe is to be conceived, the mother of the fetus knows very much so, as to the conditions and state that she is in. She knows that she has a child, and she has created that child through the actions of intercourse. But where that child actually came from before it was to be born still remains in question. The idea to this “essence” of being is the possible fabrication of things through the process of thought. The child of course did not create itself through thought, but the mother had created the child, and that too is not through thought. How so could the thinking process fabricate something? That is, if we are to consider pre determination and mix this idea with the moments and events that one is to experience. If the thought of having a child before it were to be born remains in the head of a woman, she would have to take action in order to make such an idea happen. I have another example that connects with this idea, when we are to talk about time, we consider it to go straight in one arrow. When we think the same for events, we happen to think about the events before their happening. Yet when we think of materializing something, such as an object we must consider the steps to take in order to build the right edifice. When one thinks of events, or even objects the idea of their happening before the actual event takes place. Now could that also be so, when considering the idea of the process of thought and that of creation? For instance, a being of existence becomes existent through something or someone being conscious of the existence of that being. And that being itself, even before having been born, hasn’t the consciousness of birth before it happens. The idea of creation through the process of thought must only be plausible when considering such processes of thought in connection with the external awareness of others. It is also evident that the invisible itself is not what is conscious, but the human that knows of the invisible is the one who is conscious, even though the seeker is unaware of what the invisible is, the invisible is what one labels as what they themselves, cannot see. And thus, all that is true in the external world, in relation to the process of thought only happens through the ideas of existence and awareness of being. Things only fabricate when other such things are aware of the fabrication of the others. Henceforth, the being is what the existent is aware of, and that is what makes the “essence” of being in contrast with the invisible. The awareness and consciousness is not what makes man, it is the nature itself and the external world that separates the man from that of anything else.
